Dernière actu pour vous : Suella Braverman demands automatic jail for prolific offenders in attack on Sunak’s justice plan

Voilà qui va vous plaire : Un nouveau texte que je viens de remarquer sur le web et que nous vous produisons ci-dessous. La thématique est « la justice ».

Le titre (Suella Braverman demands automatic jail for prolific offenders in attack on Sunak’s justice plan) en dit long.

Présenté sous le nom «d’anonymat
», le rédacteur est connu et fiable pour d’autres articles qu’il a publiés sur internet.

Cet article peut ainsi être pris au sérieux.

L’éditorial a été diffusé à une date indiquée 2023-12-20 14:11:00.

Suella Braverman has warned that the Government’s new sentencing plans will put public safety at risk as she called for automatic jail terms for prolific offenders.

In an article for The Telegraph, the former home secretary said plans to let offenders facing jail terms of less than 12 months serve their punishment in the community were “misguided”.

She said they failed to tackle prolific offenders who were responsible for a disproportionate number of crimes, yet who often escaped justice, and would not provide a deterrent to criminals committing more offences.

“The Sentencing Bill aims to ease pressure on the prison estate, but in my opinion will put public safety at risk, place an undue burden on the police and probation service, and potentially lead to an increase in crime,” said Mrs Braverman.

She has tabled two amendments to the Bill to toughen up penalties for prolific offenders following research by the think tank Policy Exchange which found that more than half of all criminals with at least 45 previous convictions are spared jail.

So called “hyper-prolific offenders” were found guilty of almost 10,000 offences last year, but just 47 per cent received an immediate custodial sentence, with some receiving no substantive punishment at all.

Mrs Braverman has proposed criminals who have hit 45 crimes should face a mandatory two-year custodial sentence each time they are convicted of a further serious offence.

‘Five strikes’

A second “five strikes and out” amendment would require immediate jail sentences to be the starting point for any criminal who committed a fifth successive offence.

“Jail time must be used to deter would-be criminals and public safety must come first,” she said.

The Bill, announced by Alex Chalk, the Justice Secretary, in October, creates a legal presumption that offenders facing jail terms of under 12 months will have their sentences suspended and will instead be “punished” in the community by doing unpaid work such as cleaning up litter and graffiti.

They will be fitted with electronic, GPS, alcohol or drug tags and placed under curfews of up to 20 hours a day at weekends. Any repeat offender breaching their suspended sentence would be returned to court where they would face having to serve the full term in jail.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) argues that the plan will reduce reoffending as its research shows that criminals on suspended sentences are half as likely to reoffend as those who serve short jail terms.

However, Mrs Braverman said: “The Bill, as a whole, also misses the opportunity to bolster penalties for repeat offenders. This is misguided for several reasons.”

She said most crimes were committed by a “relatively small” proportion of offenders, but too many escaped jail, citing one criminal who had 343 previous convictions but only received a community order and fine for further charges of theft. “We need to toughen up the law to deal with these career criminals,” she said.

‘Incentive to desist’

“Secondly, short sentences are an important deterrent against criminality. Without the stint of a few months in prison, many of these criminals will no doubt go on to reoffend. The deterrence of custody will be removed entirely, the incentive to desist from criminality will evaporate and victims will be failed.”

A newly released impact assessment from the MoJ shows that the policy will mean between 1,700 and 6,800 offenders including thieves, shoplifters and drink drivers will be spared jail at any one time. The mid-range estimate is 3,700.

The number spread over a year could be significantly higher as the analysis by the ministry suggests that between 50 per cent and as many as 74 per cent of the 40,000 “lower-level” criminals given custodial sentences under 12 months could be spared being sent to prison at the start of their sentence.

An MoJ spokesman said: “Under our reforms, offenders who pose significant risk to individuals or breach the courts conditions will not be able to avoid prison and judges will never be prevented from locking people up if necessary for public safety.”


Jail prolific offenders to protect the public

 

By Suella Braverman

Despite the usual brickbats which are thrown our way, the Conservatives’ record on crime is not without merit. Over the past 13 years, crime has fallen by 50 per cent on a like-for-like basis. We now have a record number of police officers on the front line, and earlier this year the Chief Inspector of Policing himself said that “England and Wales are arguably safer than they have ever been”.

There remain many challenges, however, including restoring people’s trust and confidence in the criminal justice system as a whole. We must also ensure that victims see that justice is done, that would-be criminals are deterred from breaking the law in the first place, and that those who enter the criminal justice system are rehabilitated and do not go on to re-offend.
It is with these last aims in mind that the Sentencing Bill, which received its second reading two weeks ago, raises considerable concern.

The pressure on prison places is acute. Due in large part to the longer sentences that more criminals are serving, and the high number of investigations being carried out by the police, it is undeniable that the capacity of our prisons is at breaking point. There is an urgent need to rapidly build more prison places. If planning rules are the obstacle, then they must be changed. 

The Sentencing Bill aims to ease pressure on the prison estate, but in my opinion will put public safety at risk, place an undue burden on the police and Probation Service, and potentially lead to an increase in crime.

In particular, clause 6 of the Bill effectively bans short sentences, that is sentences under 12 months. The Bill, as a whole, also misses the opportunity to bolster penalties for repeat offenders. This is misguided for several reasons.

Firstly, most crimes are committed by a relatively small proportion of offenders. They wreak havoc and blight communities. As a recent Policy Exchange report found – citing Ministry of Justice data – “prolific offenders” made up more than half of all convictions between 2000 and 2021 despite representing only 9 per cent of the nearly six million people convicted of committing a criminal offence. Their impact on communities is hugely disproportionate to their number but for 52.7 per cent of convictions they were not sentenced to a term of imprisonment at all.

We need to toughen up the law to deal with these career criminals.

Secondly, short sentences are an important deterrent against criminality. Last year thousands of criminals received short sentences for a wide variety of offences: ranging from actual bodily harm, assault against emergency workers and shop workers, to burglary and robbery. Around 3,000 people received a short sentence for carrying a weapon such as a knife or firearm, and another 500 for public order offences. There were hundreds of short sentences handed down for sexual assaults, exposure and voyeurism and sexual grooming.

Over 1,000 short sentences were handed down for dangerous driving. Under the new measures in clause 6 of the Government’s Sentencing Bill, most of these criminals would now not see any custody at all.

This is a serious problem. Without the stint of a few months in prison, many of these criminals will no doubt go on to re-offend. A tag, a caution or a community order will not provide justice for the victim of a mugging, or a violent offence. 
Will a serial burglar really change their ways if they continue to escape jail? Or a convicted protester hell-bent on causing disruption? Sadly, I don’t think so. Suspended sentences are not the answer because of the burden they place on the Probation Service and police.

This is why I have tabled amendments to the Sentencing Bill which will see more serious, repeat criminals put behind bars. I have tabled a “five strikes and you’re out” amendment so that custody must be the starting point for repeat offenders. And secondly, those who have hit 45 crimes will be met with a mandatory two-year custodial sentence each time they are convicted of a further serious offence.

I have also put forward amendments to clause 6 of the Sentencing Bill to ensure that short sentences are handed down where there is a risk of re-offending or a risk to public safety. We can do better by victims of crime. 

Prison works. Short sentences protect the public and deter criminals from committing further crime. We should not just do away with them.

Parutions:

Appel à la justice de l’État/Épitre au général Haldimand,(la couverture) .

La pratique judiciaire interne de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme,Ouvrage .

Responsabilité des avocats : civile, disciplinaire, pénale,Le livre . Disponible dans toutes les bonnes librairies.